polyclonal rabbit anti gdf15 (Assaypro)
Structured Review

Polyclonal Rabbit Anti Gdf15, supplied by Assaypro, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal rabbit anti gdf15/product/Assaypro
Average 91 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A regulatory T cell Notch4-GDF15 axis licenses tissue inflammation in asthma"
Article Title: A regulatory T cell Notch4-GDF15 axis licenses tissue inflammation in asthma
Journal: Nature immunology
doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0777-3
Figure Legend Snippet: a , flow cytometric analysis and frequencies of IL13 + ILC2 (Lineage – T1/ST2 + cells) in mice of respective genotypes treated as indicated (n=5). b , c , In vitro suppression assays using ILC2 from OVA+UFP-treated Foxp3 YFPCre mice and lung T reg cells of the respective genotypes, treated as indicated (n=4) . d , GDF15 transcripts in T reg cells of Foxp3 YFPCre , Foxp3 YFPCre Notch4 Δ/Δ and Foxp3 YFPCre Ctnnb1 Δ/Δ (n=5). e , flow cytometric analysis and frequencies of GDF15 + lung T reg cells in the respective mouse genotypes treated as indicated (n=5). f , flow cytometric analysis and frequencies of IL-13 induced in naive ILC2 stimulated with IL-33, GDF15 or both (n=3). g , IL-13 expression in naive ILC2 incubated with Notch4 hi T reg cells from OVA+UFP treated mice without or with blocking GDF15 peptide (n=6). h , In vitro suppression assays using lung T reg cells and ILC2 isolated from OVA+UFP-treated Foxp3 YFPCre mice and incubated without or with GDF15 blocking peptide (n=4). Each symbol represents an independent sample. Numbers in flow plots indicate percentages. Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical tests: two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc analysis ( a - e , h ); One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis ( f,g ). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Data representative of two or three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Expressing, Incubation, Blocking Assay, Isolation
Figure Legend Snippet: a , d , Representative PAS-stained sections of lung tissues isolated from Foxp3 YFPCre and Foxp3 YFPCre Notch4 Δ/Δ with either PBS or OVA+UFP, the latter either alone or supplemented with GDF15 or GDF15 blocking peptide, as indicated (200X magnification), Inflammation score for the respective mouse groups (n=10). b , e , AHR in Foxp3 YFPCre and Foxp3 YFPCre Notch4 Δ/Δ treated as indicated (n=10). c , f , Frequencies and absolute numbers of ILC2, eosinophils, IL-4, and IL-13, expression in lung Foxp3 – CD4 + T eff cells in the respective groups (n=10) g, AHR in Rora Cre and Rora Cre Il4/Il13 Δ/Δ treated as indicated (n=5). h, Frequencies and absolute numbers of eosinophils, ILC2, IL-4, and IL-13, expression in lung Foxp3 – CD4 + T eff cells in the respective groups (n=5). Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical tests. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis. ( a,c,d,f ), two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc analysis ( b , e , g , h ); *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Data representative of two or three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Staining, Isolation, Blocking Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , Flow cytometric analysis, cell frequencies and MFI of Notch4 expression on circulating T reg cells ( a ) and T eff cells ( b ) of control and asthmatic subjects, the latter segregated for asthma severity (control: n=39; mild n=31; moderate: n=27; severe: n=11). c , flow cytometric analysis, cell frequencies and MFI of Notch4 expression on Helios + versus Helios – circulating T reg cells of control and asthmatic subjects (control: n=13; mild n=9, moderate n=14; severe: n=11). d , e , Flow cytometric analysis, cell frequencies and MFI of Yap ( d ) and β-catenin ( e ) expression on circulating T reg cells of control and severe asthmatic subjects (control n=24; mild n=15; moderate n=15; severe: n=11). f , Serum GDF15 concentrations in moderate and severe asthmatic subjects plotted as a function of Notch4 expression on circulating T reg cells (n=21). g , In vitro suppression third party CD4 + T cells (T eff ) by the Notch4 hi versus Notch4 lo T reg cells from severe asthmatics compared to T reg cells of control subjects (n=2 subjects, 3 replicates per dilution per subject). h , In vitro suppression assays of ILC2 activation using circulating Notch4 hi T reg cells of asthmatics subjects and control T reg cells of healthy controls, incubated at the indicated T reg cell:ILC2 ratios without or with GDF15 blocking peptide (n=5). i , Flow cytometric analysis of Notch4 expression in T reg cells of a healthy control and a severe asthmatic before and after treatment with anti-IL-6R mAb (n=1). Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical tests: One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis ( a - e ); simple linear regression analysis ( f ); two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc analysis ( g,h ); ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Data representative of two or three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Expressing, In Vitro, Activation Assay, Incubation, Blocking Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , Flow cytometric analysis, cell frequencies and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Notch1, 2 and 3 expression in peripheral blood T reg cells ( a ) and T eff cells ( b ) of control and asthmatic subjects, the latter segregated for asthma severity (control n=22, M.P n= 15, Mod n= 16. S.P n=11). c , Flow cytometric analysis and cell frequencies of Notch4 peripheral blood T reg cells of healthy control, food allergy (FA), eczema and FA+eczema (Control n=37, FA n= 28, Eczema n=10 and FA+Eczema n=20) d , Serum GDF15 concentrations in asthmatic subjects plotted as a function of Notch4 expression on circulating T reg cells (n=73) e , Cell frequencies of Notch4 expression in peripheral blood T reg cells in healthy subjects, allergic and non-allergic asthmatics (control = 56, non-allergic n=21, allergic n=85). Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical tests: One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis. ( a - c,e ); simple regression analysis ( d ). ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Data representative of two or three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Expressing


